Rachel Wins Again For The Constitution, Bar Dismisses
2nd Complaint By GOP Leaders Smear Machine
RACHEL LEA HUNTER
ATTORNEY AT LAW
901 MADISON AVENUE
CARY, NORTH CAROLINA 27513-4348
September 27, 2006
Ms. Barbara B. Weyher, Chair
NC State Bar - Grievance Committee
Post Office Box 25908
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5908
Re: Bar Grievance
Your File No.: 06G0569
Dear Ms. Weyher:
Your letter of caution was received on or about September 15, 2006.
Your
letter indicates that the committee "did not find probable cause to
justify
discipline and dismissed the grievance." Nevertheless, the committee
determined that my conduct was "unprofessional."
I have a constitutional right to face my accusers, yet the disciplinary
board allows this person or persons to hide behind the cloak of
anonymity.
And as any first year law student knows, "probable cause" is defined as
a
probability that some wrong was committed and that the accused
committed it.
Yet your letter explicitly states that no probable cause was found.
What
then is the purpose of labeling me as unprofessional?
There was no investigation by the disciplinary board into the matter
and as
to the identity of the complainant, who appears to be an uneducated,
unemployed individual with a psychopathic obsession with myself and my
campaign. Attempts by this individual, assuming he is the accuser,
have
been made to intimidate members of my family and myself to get me to
drop
out of this campaign and the bar complaint is only one of several that
this
person has made to various state agencies or individuals about me, at
the
behest of my opponent and/or the NC GOP.
I did not send a statement with that heading. When it became apparent
that
the heading had been inserted, my campaign spoke to personnel in Dean
Smith's office and matters were cleared up and corrected as quickly as
possible. As for endorsements, I ask no one for their endorsement, let
alone Dean Smith. Endorsements are not meaningful unless they are
heartfelt
and volunteered. Regarding the use of my nickname, I previously
explained
that this is a made-up name that has no relation to the office of
justice
and the name was used long before I decided to run for office and the
use of
the nickname in the commercial is nothing more than an expression of
hope
for the future.
Ms. Barbara B. Weyher, Chair, NC State Bar - Grievance Committee
Page 2
September 27, 2006
It appears to me that the disciplinary board has chosen to regulate the
conduct of political campaigns and has itself become a political tool.
This
serves as an invitation to other candidates who are lawyers and
non-lawyers.
Such candidates or others acting at their behest will now know that
they
can file anonymous bar complaints, no matter how trivial or unrelated
they
are to the actual practice of law, against their hapless opponents who
have
the misfortune to be attorneys and tarnish them as you have done to me.
I intend to conduct this political campaign as I see fit without
interference. I will not be smeared by the disciplinary board nor
intimidated by anonymous individuals. Where can I go to have my
reputation
restored when this is over? My only recourse is to go to the courts to
rectify this unconstitutional and unwarranted act.
Sincerely,
Rachel Lea Hunter
Attorney at Law
RLH/rlh