24 Oct 2006
Re: GOP Fear Mongering By Justice Martin Supporters
It was nice of them to put "Madame Justice" on the front page of the
Take all the publicity you can get, thats how people remember your
I am not clear why a lawyer is unqualified for a seat on the bench,
all arent most judges at one point working lawyers (except the present
justice on the US)
Also ironic is the mailing by NC on the judges which is supposed to
non-partisan, and yet here are the Dems and Reps showing bi-partison
for Martin... somewhat curious for non-partisan elections...
Regards and stay strong
I corresponded with you last year. I hope you are doing well.
You are right - for supposedly non-partisan elections, this race has
out to be not only very partisan at the instigation of the Republicans,
also a contest between those in power (mostly attorneys and members of
I call "The Establishment" and those not in power (me and ordinary
I am not unqualified - their accomplices in the press have conceded as
We currently have 2 sitting Supreme Court Justices who were never
One of those seems to be the only person up there who stands up for the
Constitution. So I question the need for qualifications - our
only says that a candidate must be a lawyer. And trial work is not
Supreme Court does. They research and write and decide "big issues"
require deep thoughts. This is the kind of work that I have been doing
the past 18 years. I have really done the work, not delegated it to a
clerk while working on a doctorate of laws or teaching, as my opponent
You got it exactly right on the publicity issue. Give yourself a hand.
people have identified me with the name "Madame Justice."